Elundini

special votes 3 429 · All 166 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 166 voting districts here (30 599 of 66 822). The IEC publishes 45.8%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3878); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (793); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1073 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (575); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 978 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2776); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1048 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1099); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3711); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (684); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 677 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 430 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (813); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (739); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 857 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (512); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 655 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2007); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (711); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (479); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 960 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3023); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (786); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (814); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (439); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (387); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 810 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 682 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (697); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 845 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2645); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (397); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 795 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2633); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (774); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 854 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2541); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 610 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1850); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (504); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 866 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2614); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 593 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1725); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1072 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2956); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 479 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:42 SAST.