Emalahleni

Ward 1: 10 of 12 voting districts in, ANC 67.8% so farWard 2: 8 of 9 voting districts in, ANC 81.3% so farWard 3: 8 of 10 voting districts in, ANC 78.9% so farWard 4: 4 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 62.0% so farWard 5: 9 of 10 voting districts in, ANC 70.4% so farWard 8: ANC 61.8%Ward 9: ANC 65.1%Ward 10: ANC 78.7%Ward 11: ANC 57.0%Ward 12: 10 of 11 voting districts in, ANC 50.7% so farWard 13: 9 of 11 voting districts in, ANC 65.6% so farWard 14: ANC 67.1%Ward 15: 9 of 11 voting districts in, ANC 82.6% so farWard 16: ANC 68.0%Ward 17: 5 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 88.6% so farWard 6: 10 of 11 voting districts in, ANC 80.0% so farWard 7: 11 of 12 voting districts in, ANC 51.6% so far
WardsANC 17Partly counted 11darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2000 Ward 2 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 68.7%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot
  • ANC 68.7%
  • DA 10.7%
  • SACP 5.2%
  • Others 15.4%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Emalahleni145 of 161 voting districts in
6 of 17 wards complete
Turnout so far51.5%
Voters on the roll so far62 234
South Africa · Counting21 703 of 23 696 voting districts in (91.6%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 30 395 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Emalahleni vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Emalahleni ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 2, Emalahleni in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 17

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 4 770 · 146 of 161 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 146 voting districts with results so far here (30 439 of 59 111). The IEC publishes 50.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3716); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 466 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3747); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1099 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (667); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1414 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4447); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1583 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4751); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 321 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (925); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (669); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3883); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 456 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (731); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3991); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 683 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2003); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 928 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 844 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2540); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (733); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1373 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (791); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 887 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2636); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 18:24 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it