Enoch Mgijima

special votes 7 626 · All 168 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 168 voting districts here (65 728 of 128 231). The IEC publishes 51.6%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3568); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (389); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3542); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 866 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2543); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 786 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 997 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2866); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (530); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (884); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1044); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 581 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1724); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 572 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 588 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1649); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 533 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1719); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (707); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (666); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 756 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 523 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1784 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4818); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1056); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (988); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 610 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 494 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1570); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 394 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (926); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (915); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (543); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 569 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1646); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 509 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 448 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 559 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1635); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 498 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1903); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 504 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1516); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (398); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 629 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1425); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 642 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 492 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1491); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 543 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1583); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (728); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (530); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1089 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (755); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (470); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (636); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 995 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3049); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 827 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (547); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 388 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 855 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2738); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 782 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2409); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (851); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 991 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3049); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 934 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2870); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (624); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (595); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 867 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1449 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (646); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 977 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 609 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1924); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 732 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 597 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1799); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1009 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (549); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1321 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4062); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1096 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1067 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (636); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1079 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 586 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1739); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 475 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1389); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 19:08 SAST.