WardsANC 6DA 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2000 Ward 5 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ANC majority

7 of 13 seats

Most ward votes: ANC 47.0%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Great KeiAll 43 voting districts in

All 7 wards complete

Turnout62.8%

Voters on the roll20 818

South Africa · Counting21 444 of 23 696 voting districts in (90.5%)

checked 17:38Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 12 765 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress6 00047.0%
GKCMGreat Kei Community Movement2 10916.5%
DADemocratic Alliance2 08916.4%
IndependentIndependent candidates7385.8%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters7115.6%
SACPSouth African Communist Party6044.7%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus2912.3%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement770.6%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party430.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance430.3%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement380.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party120.1%
ARECOArusha Economic Coalition100.1%

Council seats · 13 ?

African National Congress6 ward · 1 PR7
Democratic Alliance1 ward · 1 PR2
Great Kei Community Movement0 ward · 2 PR2
South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Great Kei ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power66hours off7 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 5, Great Kei in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 7

On EskomSePush

Great KeiPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 681 · All 43 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 43 voting districts here (13 074 of 20 818). The IEC publishes 62.8%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1040 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3097); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 395 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (610); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 862 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 571 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1978); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 389 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 873 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (706); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 753 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 511 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1440); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1504); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 647 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (640); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (691); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1011 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3014); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1078); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 347 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1054); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.