WardsDA 3Partly counted 3No results, yetdarker = bigger win

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

DA 64.7%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot

DA 64.7%
ANC 19.7%
VF PLUS 10.4%
Others 5.2%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting717 of 23 696 voting districts in (3.0%)checked 02:04Latest results

Inxuba Yethemba9 of 34 voting districts in0 of 9 wards complete

Turnout so far42.7%

Voters on the roll so far1 822

Ward ballot ? · 770 valid votes

DADemocratic Alliance49864.7%
ANCAfrican National Congress15219.7%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus8010.4%
PAPatriotic Alliance243.1%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters81.0%
IndependentIndependent candidates70.9%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement10.1%

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Inxuba Yethemba vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Inxuba Yethemba ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 9

On EskomSePush

Inxuba YethembaPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 35 · 9 of 34 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 9 voting districts with results so far here (778 of 1 822). The IEC publishes 42.7%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (776); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 02:02 SAST.