WardsANC 5DA 3Independent 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2011 Ward 7 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 8 of 18 seats · 10 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 40.6%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Inxuba YethembaAll 34 voting districts in

All 9 wards complete

Turnout53.1%

Voters on the roll33 121

South Africa · Counting22 535 of 23 696 voting districts in (95.1%)

checked 21:42Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 17 286 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress7 01440.6%
DADemocratic Alliance6 81939.4%
IndependentIndependent candidates1 3197.6%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus8154.7%
PAPatriotic Alliance7684.4%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters3762.2%
SACPSouth African Communist Party840.5%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement390.2%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party280.2%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement240.1%

Council seats · 18 ?

African National Congress5 ward · 3 PR8
Democratic Alliance3 ward · 4 PR7
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1

Independent councillors1

Hours off in Inxuba Yethemba ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2011 Ward 7, Inxuba Yethemba in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 9

On EskomSePush

Inxuba YethembaPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 2 724 · All 34 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 34 voting districts here (17 594 of 33 121). The IEC publishes 53.2%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 873 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3637); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (786); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1059 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3653); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (953); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 606 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1762); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1639 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4947); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1013); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (664); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 943 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2770); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 645 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1955); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (660); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (614); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1032 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 836 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 946 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2883); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 853 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 13:51 SAST.