No majority
ANC 10 of 25 seats · 13 for a majority
Most ward votes: ANC 31.2%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 23 572 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress7 35931.2%
DADemocratic Alliance6 37127.0%- MUCMMakana United Civic Movement4 69219.9%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1 4046.0%- SACPSouth African Communist Party1 2765.4%
PAPatriotic Alliance7663.2%- MAKANAMakana Citizens Front6332.7%
ActionSA3971.7%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement2651.1%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1470.6%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement840.4%- IndependentIndependent candidates740.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party620.3%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement420.2%
Council seats · 25 ?
- African National Congress10 ward · 0 PR10
- Democratic Alliance3 ward · 3 PR6
- Makana United Civic Movement0 ward · 4 PR4
- South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1
- Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
- Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
- ActionSA0 ward · 1 PR1
- Makana Citizens Front0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in Makana ?
Reported in the ESP app
2016 Ward 5, Makana in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 13
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 2 236 · All 42 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 42 voting districts here (23 808 of 47 092). The IEC publishes 51.2%.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 634 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2030); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 624 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1201); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 827 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2518); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 439 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (897); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (785); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (772); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (322); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1081 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3360); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 411 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1214); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (688); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1499 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4863); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (890); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 524 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1599); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1264); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (650); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 796 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2452); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 417 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (864); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (997); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (728); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 679 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2067); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (830); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1269); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (531); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1081 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3276); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (549); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (689); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (410); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 757 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2350); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 426 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (889); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (662); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 708 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (677); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (676); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 756 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2295); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (582); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (453); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (462); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 439 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1347); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 310 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (942); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 830 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2665); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2198: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (456); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (919); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (667); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.