Matatiele

Ward 1: 1 of 4 voting districts in, ANC 61.9% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 2: not in yetWard 3: not in yetWard 4: 1 of 8 voting districts in, ANC 88.5% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 5: not in yetWard 6: 1 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 49.4% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 7: not in yetWard 8: 1 of 7 voting districts in, SACP 43.4% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 9: not in yetWard 10: 1 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 72.7% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 11: not in yetWard 12: not in yetWard 13: 2 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 81.3% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 14: 1 of 11 voting districts in, ANC 63.3% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 15: 1 of 9 voting districts in, ANC 49.1% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 16: not in yetWard 17: not in yetWard 18: not in yetWard 19: not in yetWard 20: not in yetWard 21: not in yetWard 22: not in yetWard 23: not in yetWard 24: not in yetWard 25: not in yetWard 26: 2 of 8 voting districts in, ANC 35.7% so far (Ward ballot)
WardsANC 8SACP 1Partly counted 9No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 59.1%

Leading on the DC 40% ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · DC 40% ballot
  • ANC 59.1%
  • DA 16.9%
  • SACP 6.8%
  • Others 17.3%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 400 of 23 696 voting districts in (5.9%)checked Latest results
Matatiele11 of 185 voting districts in0 of 26 wards complete
Turnout so far50.3%
Voters on the roll so far3 170

DC 40% ballot ? · 1 671 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Matatiele vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Matatiele ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power153hours off13 outages
Water10hours off1 outage
Internet0hours offNo outages
May · Power: 56 hours offMay: 56 hours off56MayJun · Power: 6 hours offJun: 6 hours off6JunJul · Power: 71 hours offJul · Water: 10 hours offJul: 81 hours off81JulAug · Power: 3 hours offAug: 3 hours off3AugSep · Power: 12 hours offSep: 12 hours off12SepOct · Power: 6 hours offOct: 6 hours off6Oct

Wards · 26

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 111 · 11 of 185 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 11 voting districts with results so far here (1 595 of 3 170). The IEC publishes 50.6%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 4713 differs from the sum of party rows 5003 by 290; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (780); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:32 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it