Matatiele

special votes 5 726 · All 185 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 185 voting districts here (52 656 of 107 451). The IEC publishes 49.4%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1094 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (801); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (504); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3709); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 394 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (512); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 974 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2992); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 626 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1850); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (526); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 317 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (849); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (560); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3766); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (832); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 670 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 606 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1762); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (727); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3714); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (553); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (514); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3639); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (866); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (536); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3761); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 411 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1002 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (731); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (831); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (768); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1075 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (563); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1053 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (554); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3610); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 801 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 359 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1069 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2992); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (827); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (724); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 893 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2709); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 591 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1703); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (554); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1068 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 473 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3832); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (505); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1012 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 914 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 610 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1850); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1069); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 993 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 611 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1796); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 321 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (958); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 15:15 SAST.