ANC 54.2%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 54.2%
- UDM 24.9%
- EFF 6.9%
- Others 13.9%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 2 249 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress1 22054.2%
UDMUnited Democratic Movement56124.9%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1556.9%- SACPSouth African Communist Party1536.8%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement612.7%
DADemocratic Alliance351.6%
BPMBatho Pele Movement180.8%
A.DAfrican Democrats120.5%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania100.4%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party70.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party60.3%- LABOURLabour Party of South Africa60.3%
- AMAMBOAmabomvane Revolutionary Movement30.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance20.1%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Mbhashe vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Mbhashe ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 32
- Ward 21 of 7 voting districts inEFF 33.3%
- Ward 31 of 13 voting districts inANC 66.0%
- Ward 41 of 13 voting districts inANC 50.6%
- Ward 73 of 14 voting districts inANC 52.4%
- Ward 111 of 13 voting districts inANC 75.2%
- Ward 121 of 11 voting districts inANC 76.1%
- Ward 151 of 14 voting districts inUDM 47.1%
- Ward 242 of 11 voting districts inUDM 44.8%
- Ward 252 of 10 voting districts inANC 56.3%
- Ward 261 of 8 voting districts inANC 95.8%
- Ward 1Not in yet
- Ward 5–
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 8–
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 10Not in yet
- Ward 13Not in yet
- Ward 14Not in yet
- Ward 16Not in yet
- Ward 17Not in yet
- Ward 18Not in yet
- Ward 19Not in yet
- Ward 20Not in yet
- Ward 21Not in yet
- Ward 22Not in yet
- Ward 23Not in yet
- Ward 27Not in yet
- Ward 28Not in yet
- Ward 29Not in yet
- Ward 30Not in yet
- Ward 31Not in yet
- Ward 32Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 185 · 17 of 328 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 17 voting districts with results so far here (2 285 of 6 092). The IEC publishes 37.6%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (575); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 391 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1163); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (581); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 02:50 SAST.