Mbhashe

special votes 4 328 · 276 of 328 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 276 voting districts with results so far here (53 281 of 115 634). The IEC publishes 45.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 628 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1859); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 567 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 658 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1941); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 423 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 949 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2871); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (652); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 454 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 890 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 342 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1075); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (950); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 859 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (944); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1058 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 651 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1963); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (899); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 982 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2912); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 433 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (666); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (439); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 994 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2992); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (764); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (536); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 829 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (489); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 868 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2599); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 495 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 875 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2646); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 826 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2482); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 467 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 427 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (623); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 705 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 678 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2040); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (436); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1011 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3011); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 950 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2855); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 664 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1989); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 977 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2905); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (907); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (690); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 950 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2862); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 395 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (567); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 709 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 647 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1956); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1087); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (704); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (734); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (916); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (557); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 523 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 720 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1095 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (732); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 664 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1999); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 493 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1734); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 884 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2857); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (728); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3994); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 317 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 935 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2803); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 13:54 SAST.