Mnquma

Ward 1: not in yetWard 2: not in yetWard 3: not in yetWard 4: not in yetWard 5: 1 of 5 voting districts inWard 6: not in yetWard 7: not in yetWard 8: 2 of 14 voting districts in, ANC 55.1% so farWard 9: not in yetWard 10: not in yetWard 11: 1 of 16 voting districts in, ANC 81.3% so farWard 12: not in yetWard 13: 1 of 8 voting districts in, ANC 54.5% so farWard 14: not in yetWard 15: not in yetWard 16: not in yetWard 17: not in yetWard 18: not in yetWard 19: not in yetWard 20: not in yetWard 21: 1 of 11 voting districts in, ANC 52.6% so farWard 22: not in yetWard 23: not in yetWard 24: 1 of 10 voting districts in, ANC 69.2% so farWard 25: not in yetWard 26: not in yetWard 27: not in yetWard 28: not in yetWard 29: not in yetWard 30: not in yetWard 31: not in yetWard 32: not in yet
WardsANC 5Partly counted 6No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

ANC 55.7%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot
  • ANC 55.7%
  • UDM 16.1%
  • EFF 7.8%
  • Others 20.4%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting717 of 23 696 voting districts in (3.0%)checked Latest results
Mnquma7 of 279 voting districts in0 of 32 wards complete
Turnout so far32.3%
Voters on the roll so far2 062

Ward ballot ? · 653 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Mnquma vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Mnquma ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power11hours off1 outage
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep: 0 hours off0SepOct · Power: 11 hours offOct: 11 hours off11Oct

Wards · 32

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 30 · 7 of 279 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 7 voting districts with results so far here (665 of 2 062). The IEC publishes 32.4%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 02:02 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it