Mnquma

special votes 4 922 · All 279 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 279 voting districts here (56 754 of 124 301). The IEC publishes 45.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 543 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1617); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 373 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (663); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (560); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1665); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 392 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 745 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (778); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (767); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 616 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1806); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 610 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1839); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (764); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (735); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 439 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 505 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1536); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (763); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 366 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 366 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1049); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (713); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 770 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 320 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (871); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (570); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1041); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 430 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3943); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (648); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 820 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 792 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2466); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (353); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 690 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1089); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1089 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (540); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (400); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3667); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 825 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (607); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 927 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (867); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 953 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3000); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (694); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1071 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1071); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 667 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (647); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1008 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 727 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 633 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1881); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 936 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2940); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 488 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (839); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 868 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 602 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1798); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1001 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2967); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 597 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 555 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1610); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 414 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 810 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1055 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (791); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 871 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2573); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 828 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (628); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (571); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1072 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 872 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2564); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3242: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1857: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 21:45 SAST.