Ndlambe

Ward 1: not in yetWard 2: 2 of 5 voting districts inWard 3: 1 of 3 voting districts inWard 4: 2 of 3 voting districts inWard 5: 1 of 4 voting districts inWard 6: 2 of 6 voting districts inWard 7: not in yetWard 8: not in yetWard 9: not in yetWard 10: not in yet
Partly counted 5No results, yet
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 911 of 23 696 voting districts in (8.1%)checked Latest results
Ndlambe8 of 34 voting districts in0 of 10 wards complete

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Ndlambe vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Ndlambe ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power64hours off6 outages
Water65hours off6 outages
Internet28hours off4 outages
May · Power: 19 hours offMay · Internet: 8 hours offMay: 27 hours off27MayJun · Water: 13 hours offJun · Internet: 7 hours offJun: 20 hours off20JunJul · Water: 8 hours offJul · Internet: 13 hours offJul: 21 hours off21JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep · Power: 13 hours offSep · Water: 33 hours offSep: 46 hours off46SepOct · Power: 31 hours offOct · Water: 11 hours offOct: 42 hours off42Oct

Wards · 10

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Results are not shown because IEC figures did not reconcile: ward ballot valid 424 + spoilt 3 != cast 174. We report this rather than guess.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 8 voting districts with results so far here (1 985 of 3 264). The IEC publishes 68.6%.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 378 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 171 differs from the sum of party rows 424 by 253; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 423 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 750 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 68.6%; its own counts give 60.81% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 04:05 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it