Ngqushwa

special votes 2 836 · All 89 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 89 voting districts here (19 450 of 38 001). The IEC publishes 51.5%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 904 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2999); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (764); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (573); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1025 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1098 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (322); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1078); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 897 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2667); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (686); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 836 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2568); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 600 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1747); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 940 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (866); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1486 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1715 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4964); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (738); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1561 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4795); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (624); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (304); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 16:33 SAST.