Ngquza Hill

special votes 3 444 · All 247 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 247 voting districts here (70 989 of 157 067). The IEC publishes 45.9%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 715 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (725); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1099 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (621); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3572); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (961); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (682); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (504); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1748 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (798); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (353); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3438); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (833); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (517); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 819 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2074); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (436); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1959); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4690); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (695); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 423 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (747); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (556); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (940); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3884); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 381 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1001); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (522); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 700 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 542 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1040); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (965); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (479); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 800 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2555); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 546 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1698); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (727); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (681); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1046 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 679 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1985); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (276); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 826 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2673); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (614); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 940 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 323 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (882); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (685); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (443); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1082); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (966); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (619); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3533); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (898); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1422 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (666); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (564); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (447); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (470); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1092 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 439 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1071 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 580 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1712); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3603); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 855 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 893 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (523); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (587); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3975); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (570); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 700 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (734); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 378 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1035 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3048); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 426 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3902); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (926); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1076); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4007); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 00:07 SAST.