Ngquza Hill

Ward 3: 8 of 9 voting districts in, ANC 58.3% so farWard 4: 6 of 10 voting districts in, ANC 57.3% so farWard 5: ANC 78.9%Ward 6: ANC 42.3%Ward 7: 9 of 11 voting districts in, SACP 41.7% so farWard 8: ANC 78.0%Ward 9: ANC 53.2%Ward 10: ANC 60.1%Ward 11: ANC 67.3%Ward 12: 9 of 10 voting districts in, ANC 62.9% so farWard 13: ANC 32.3%Ward 14: 3 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 35.9% so farWard 15: 4 of 6 voting districts in, ANC 46.4% so farWard 16: 4 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 39.8% so farWard 17: 6 of 8 voting districts in, SACP 44.2% so farWard 18: 10 of 11 voting districts in, ANC 54.7% so farWard 19: ANC 53.7%Ward 20: 4 of 6 voting districts in, ANC 52.8% so farWard 21: 6 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 52.5% so farWard 22: 5 of 6 voting districts in, ANC 56.0% so farWard 23: 6 of 9 voting districts in, ANC 40.9% so farWard 24: 5 of 6 voting districts in, Independent 54.1% so farWard 25: ANC 69.7%Ward 26: ANC 49.3%Ward 27: Independent 38.6%Ward 28: ANC 65.0%Ward 29: ANC 55.3%Ward 30: ANC 65.0%Ward 31: ANC 61.4%Ward 32: ANC 55.8%Ward 1: 7 of 8 voting districts in, ANC 43.3% so farWard 2: ANC 68.1%
WardsANC 28SACP 2Independent 2Partly counted 15darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2000 Ward 3 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 51.5%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot
  • ANC 51.5%
  • SACP 10.7%
  • Independent 10.7%
  • Others 27.2%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Ngquza Hill222 of 247 voting districts in
17 of 32 wards complete
Turnout so far44.6%
Voters on the roll so far143k
South Africa · Counting21 779 of 23 696 voting districts in (91.9%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 61 820 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Ngquza Hill vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Ngquza Hill ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 3, Ingquza in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 32

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 3 196 · 224 of 247 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 224 voting districts with results so far here (63 840 of 143 168). The IEC publishes 45.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 697 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (543); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1044 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3081); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 785 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (463); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1748 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (798); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (353); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3438); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (833); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (517); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 527 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (387); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1618); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4690); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (695); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 423 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (747); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (556); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (940); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2929); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (967); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 700 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 542 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1035); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (917); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 688 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1649); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (703); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 767 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 650 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (304); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 662 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (389); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3710); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (949); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (603); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3533); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (898); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 815 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (579); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 853 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2385); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (956); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 723 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1983); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 869 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 822 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1674); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 695 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1677); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (587); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3975); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (570); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 700 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (734); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 378 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1035 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3048); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 426 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3902); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (926); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1076); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4007); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 18:27 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it