Ntabankulu

special votes 3 299 · All 146 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 146 voting districts here (31 743 of 77 825). The IEC publishes 41.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1388 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4023); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3984); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3647); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1028 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3045); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3019); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 459 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (668); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (600); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1078 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (882); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (595); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1283 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3798); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 873 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 321 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (950); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (583); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3748); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (660); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (605); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3552); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:19 SAST.