Port St Johns

Ward 1: ANC 47.2%Ward 2: ANC 52.0%Ward 3: ANC 65.2%Ward 4: ANC 51.9%Ward 5: 6 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 69.1% so farWard 6: 6 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 38.2% so farWard 8: ANC 49.8%Ward 10: ANC 67.5%Ward 11: 8 of 9 voting districts in, ANC 67.2% so farWard 12: ANC 90.5%Ward 13: ANC 84.4%Ward 14: ANC 61.8%Ward 15: ANC 88.4%Ward 17: ANC 75.9%Ward 18: ANC 62.8%Ward 19: ANC 63.3%Ward 20: ANC 54.6%Ward 21: ANC 61.5%Ward 7: ANC 59.0%Ward 9: 6 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 55.7% so farWard 16: ANC 55.5%
WardsANC 21Partly counted 4darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2000 Ward 7 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC majority

26 of 42 seats

Most ward votes: ANC 62.3%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Port St Johns147 of 151 voting districts in
17 of 21 wards complete
Turnout so far46.1%
Voters on the roll so far96 909
South Africa · Counting23 062 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.3%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 43 684 valid votes

Council seats · 42 ?

  1. African National Congress21 ward · 5 PR26
  2. South African Communist Party0 ward · 4 PR4
  3. African Transformation Movement0 ward · 3 PR3
  4. United Democratic Movement0 ward · 2 PR2
  5. Democratic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2
  6. Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 2 PR2
  7. Umkhonto Wesizwe Party0 ward · 2 PR2
  8. Labour Party of South Africa0 ward · 1 PR1

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Port St Johns vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Port St Johns ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 7, Port St. Johns in 2026 ?

Wards · 21

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 960 · 147 of 151 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 147 voting districts with results so far here (43 374 of 94 152). The IEC publishes 46.6%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3930); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 857 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2650); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (667); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3629); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 543 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1616); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (846); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3745); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 473 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1409); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 322 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (952); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3640); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (409); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 825 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 606 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1761); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3781); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 347 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1048); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (532); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (447); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1017 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 530 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1048); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (825); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 880 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2630); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (934); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1557 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1896 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5730); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 310 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (924); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1560 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4629); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1747 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (527); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1731 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3560); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 384 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (787); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2201: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (660); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1070 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3929); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (890); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 816 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2398); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2114: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 928 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1791: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 17:37 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it