Raymond Mhlaba

special votes 5 247 · All 154 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 154 voting districts here (42 557 of 90 060). The IEC publishes 47.9%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1310 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5002); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (636); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3580); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (762); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (686); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3895); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1455 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (924); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 976 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3075); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1073); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 862 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 651 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 412 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (804); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 882 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2662); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 485 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1466); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 928 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3052); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 603 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1858); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (755); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1363 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (425); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 399 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2012); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (835); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (479); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1380 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 646 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 522 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1573); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (607); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1690 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5007); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (676); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1014 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 948 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (489); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 955 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2944); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 476 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1026); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 938 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2751); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3880); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 537 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1539); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 325 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (969); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:30 SAST.