WardsANC 9darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ANC majority

11 of 17 seats

Most DC 40% votes: ANC 62.7% · down 7.5 pts from 70.2% in 2021

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

SakhisizweAll 62 voting districts in

All 9 wards complete

Turnout46.9%

Voters on the roll34 043

South Africa · Counting22 893 of 23 696 voting districts in (96.6%)

checked 23:24Latest results

DC 40% ballot ? · 15 581 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress9 77162.7%
DADemocratic Alliance2 32814.9%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1 1807.6%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement7384.7%
SACPSouth African Communist Party5073.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party4062.6%
AICAfrican Independent Congress1601.0%
ActionSA890.6%
LABOURLabour Party of South Africa860.6%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party840.5%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus480.3%
The IndependentsThe Independents450.3%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement430.3%
ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation240.2%
PAPatriotic Alliance200.1%
APFAfrican People First180.1%
AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress170.1%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah60.0%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party50.0%
ILISOIliso Labantu Movement for Social Change30.0%
HCDFHofmeyr Community Development Forum30.0%

Council seats · 17 ?

African National Congress9 ward · 2 PR11
Democratic Alliance0 ward · 3 PR3
South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
African Transformation Movement0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Sakhisizwe ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 9

On EskomSePush

SakhisizwePower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 2 583 · All 62 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 62 voting districts here (15 971 of 34 043). The IEC publishes 47.6%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 945 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2847); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 618 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1870); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1053 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 549 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1621); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1410 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (864); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 824 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2436); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (966); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3459); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (587); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (512); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 953 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2863); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (592); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (536); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1035 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (489); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2012: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4099); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1007 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1514: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1737: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 16:50 SAST.