Sundays River Valley

Ward 1: 1 of 3 voting districts in, ANC 78.3% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 2: not in yetWard 3: not in yetWard 4: 3 of 4 voting districts in, DA 37.7% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 5: 1 of 4 voting districts in, DA 37.9% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 6: 2 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 51.3% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 7: 8 of 9 voting districts in, DA 42.2% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 8: 5 of 7 voting districts in, DA 44.8% so far (Ward ballot)
WardsDA 4ANC 2Partly counted 6No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

ANC 42.5%

Leading on the DC 40% ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · DC 40% ballot
  • ANC 42.5%
  • DA 34.6%
  • PA 11.9%
  • Others 10.9%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 552 of 23 696 voting districts in (6.5%)checked Latest results
Sundays River Valley20 of 37 voting districts in0 of 8 wards complete
Turnout so far47.8%
Voters on the roll so far7 399

DC 40% ballot ? · 3 469 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Sundays River Valley vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Sundays River Valley ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power43hours off4 outages
Water12hours off1 outage
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul · Power: 15 hours offJul: 15 hours off15JulAug · Power: 14 hours offAug: 14 hours off14AugSep · Water: 12 hours offSep: 12 hours off12SepOct · Power: 14 hours offOct: 14 hours off14Oct

Wards · 8

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 455 · 20 of 37 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 20 voting districts with results so far here (3 539 of 7 399). The IEC publishes 47.8%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 533 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (783); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1051); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 406 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (952); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:34 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it