WardsANC 7DA 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2016 Ward 2 (2016 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 8 of 16 seats · 9 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 51.2%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Sundays River ValleyAll 37 voting districts in

All 8 wards complete

Turnout50.5%

Voters on the roll27 339

South Africa · Counting23 264 of 23 696 voting districts in (98.2%)

checked 06:24Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 13 565 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress6 94251.2%
DADemocratic Alliance2 97721.9%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania1 0637.8%
PAPatriotic Alliance9406.9%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters6755.0%
SACPSouth African Communist Party5233.9%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus2772.0%
GOOD650.5%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party650.5%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement210.2%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement170.1%

Council seats · 16 ?

African National Congress7 ward · 1 PR8
Democratic Alliance1 ward · 3 PR4
Pan Africanist Congress of Azania0 ward · 1 PR1
South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Sundays River Valley ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power43hours off4 outages

Water12hours off1 outage

Internet0hours offNo outages

2016 Ward 2, Sundays River Valley in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 8

On EskomSePush

Sundays River ValleyPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 443 · All 37 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 37 voting districts here (13 812 of 27 339). The IEC publishes 50.6%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3985); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 928 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2763); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 557 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1658); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1066); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 925 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2810); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (818); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 873 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2629); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 412 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 830 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 341 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (977); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 972 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2858); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 384 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (304); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 833 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2533); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 635 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 08:08 SAST.