Umzimvubu

Get the app
Ward 1: ANC 55.4%Ward 2: ANC 45.8%Ward 3: ANC 63.0%Ward 4: ANC 67.7%Ward 5: ANC 68.3%Ward 6: DA 43.2%Ward 7: ANC 59.8%Ward 8: ANC 74.6%Ward 9: ANC 61.1%Ward 10: ANC 61.0%Ward 11: ANC 48.6%Ward 15: ANC 75.8%Ward 16: ANC 67.1%Ward 17: ANC 63.0%Ward 18: ANC 59.8%Ward 19: ANC 65.9%Ward 20: ANC 68.8%Ward 21: ANC 60.4%Ward 22: ANC 58.7%Ward 23: ANC 40.9%Ward 24: ANC 63.9%Ward 25: ANC 74.6%Ward 26: ANC 57.8%Ward 27: ANC 50.2%Ward 28: ANC 53.6%Ward 12: ANC 45.8%Ward 13: ANC 70.6%Ward 14: ANC 57.9%
WardsANC 27DA 1darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2000 Ward 11 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC majority

34 of 55 seats

Most ward votes: ANC 59.4%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

UmzimvubuAll 229 voting districts in
All 28 wards complete
Turnout43.7%
Voters on the roll117k
South Africa · Counting22 297 of 23 696 voting districts in (94.1%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 50 109 valid votes

Council seats · 55 ?

  1. African National Congress27 ward · 7 PR34
  2. Democratic Alliance1 ward · 4 PR5
  3. South African Communist Party0 ward · 5 PR5
  4. Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 3 PR3
  5. African Transformation Movement0 ward · 3 PR3
  6. African Independent Congress0 ward · 2 PR2
  7. Umkhonto Wesizwe Party0 ward · 2 PR2
  8. Izwi Labahlali Beward0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Umzimvubu ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 11, Umzimvubu in 2026 ?

Wards · 28

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 3 716 · All 229 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 229 voting districts here (51 282 of 117 255). The IEC publishes 44.1%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3697); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1077); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 786 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 388 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (504); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (463); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (783); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (443); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1492 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 814 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2579); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 665 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3552); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1073 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 347 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1035); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 951 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2841); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (663); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 898 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 839 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2601); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 732 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1016 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3009); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 479 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3801); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 849 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1054 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (557); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (489); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 699 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1964); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3821); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (674); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3674); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (322); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1098 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (910); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (542); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 874 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2724); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (552); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (510); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3901); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (783); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3825); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (774); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1047 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 721 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2099); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 831 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:15 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it