WardsANC 8DA 2EFF 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2016 Ward 1 (2016 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 11 of 22 seats · 12 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 47.7%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Walter SisuluAll 39 voting districts in

All 11 wards complete

Turnout51.6%

Voters on the roll41 429

South Africa · Counting23 483 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.1%)

checked 13:29Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 21 033 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress10 04247.7%
DADemocratic Alliance4 98623.7%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters3 28215.6%
SACPSouth African Communist Party6082.9%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement5222.5%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus4432.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance4322.1%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party3391.6%
IndependentIndependent candidates1780.8%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania1320.6%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement330.2%
URFUnited Residents Front240.1%
Maletswai Civic AssociationMaletswai Civic Association120.1%

Council seats · 22 ?

African National Congress8 ward · 3 PR11
Democratic Alliance2 ward · 3 PR5
Economic Freedom Fighters1 ward · 2 PR3
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1
African Transformation Movement0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Walter Sisulu ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power13hours off2 outages

Water11hours off1 outage

Internet0hours offNo outages

2016 Ward 1, Maletswai/Gariep in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 11

On EskomSePush

Walter SisuluPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 2 066 · All 39 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 39 voting districts here (21 363 of 41 429). The IEC publishes 51.6%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 816 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 551 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1674); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (503); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 691 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2053); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 697 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2059); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 656 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1927); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 754 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 691 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1079 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (690); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3858); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 971 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2819); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (695); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1018 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2996); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 625 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1738); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 966 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2819); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 530 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 801 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2466); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 624 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1735); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (400); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 718 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 700 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 14:17 SAST.