Winnie Madikizela-Mandela

Get the app
Ward 1: ANC 39.8%Ward 2: ANC 61.0%Ward 3: ANC 55.5%Ward 4: ANC 75.7%Ward 5: ANC 48.2%Ward 6: ANC 54.3%Ward 8: ANC 54.6%Ward 9: ANC 64.5%Ward 10: ANC 47.2%Ward 11: ANC 50.3%Ward 13: ANC 55.1%Ward 14: ANC 49.4%Ward 15: ANC 56.4%Ward 16: ANC 42.2%Ward 17: ANC 56.5%Ward 18: ANC 58.4%Ward 19: ANC 70.5%Ward 20: ANC 68.3%Ward 21: ANC 39.6%Ward 22: ANC 52.1%Ward 23: ANC 54.9%Ward 24: ANC 47.0%Ward 25: ANC 71.8%Ward 26: ANC 45.5%Ward 27: ANC 57.5%Ward 28: ANC 35.7%Ward 29: ANC 56.9%Ward 32: ANC 56.1%Ward 7: ANC 44.7%Ward 12: ANC 66.0%Ward 30: ANC 71.9%Ward 31: ANC 54.3%
WardsANC 32darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2000 Ward 10 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC majority

36 of 64 seats

Most ward votes: ANC 55.1%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Winnie Madikizela-MandelaAll 274 voting districts in
All 32 wards complete
Turnout45.3%
Voters on the roll153k
South Africa · Counting23 652 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.8%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 67 696 valid votes

Council seats · 64 ?

Hours off in Winnie Madikizela-Mandela ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 10, Mbizana in 2026 ?

Wards · 32

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 4 295 · All 274 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 274 voting districts here (69 264 of 152 855). The IEC publishes 45.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 727 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 397 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1072 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (650); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3811); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1076); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (539); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1620 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4831); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1003 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3086); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 407 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (735); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (532); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1041 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 962 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2900); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3806); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 364 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1095); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (740); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (927); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 913 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2826); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (862); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (660); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 827 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 498 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1392 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3542); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 343 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1013); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3565); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (583); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 471 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1397); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 940 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2838); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 690 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2019); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (578); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3894); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3645); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (969); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (807); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (533); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 844 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2554); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 564 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1676); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (604); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1057 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 682 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1865); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3878); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (515); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 422 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 355 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1086); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (590); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2028 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 488 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 976 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (530); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 807 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 844 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2522); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 662 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1964); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1692); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3456); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3639); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (398); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3273: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 895 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2673); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1065); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3210: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1002 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3031); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (900); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1702: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 997: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1331: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 610: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 15:28 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it