Midvaal

special votes 2 342 · 37 of 39 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 37 voting districts with results so far here (35 024 of 57 439). The IEC publishes 53.0%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 555 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (867); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (604); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6960); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2633 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7919); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 374 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1083); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1732 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (811); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1621 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1033); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (729); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1032 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 792 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (467); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 896 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (734); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1025 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3020); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 483 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1558); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (556); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4646); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1073); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (797); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1569 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1768); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1082); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 862 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 657 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1925); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2051); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2794 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2093 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 52.98%; its own counts give 60.98% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 10:37 SAST.