JB Marks

special votes 9 313 · All 106 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 106 voting districts here (70 155 of 131 963). The IEC publishes 53.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 381 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1090); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (587); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 686 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2029); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 382 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (719); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3097 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 713 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (899); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 399 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1628 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 606 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1879); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 830 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1059); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1645 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4823); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (817); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (778); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (668); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 975 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2851); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (626); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (466); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 947 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2850); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 325 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (590); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 845 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 490 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (916); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 587 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1711); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (768); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 880 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (855); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3440); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 563 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1764); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (950); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 967 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2906); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1604 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 500 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 767 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 887 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2558); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (549); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 957 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2915); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (793); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (674); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1421 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (902); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (757); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (543); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 765 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 446 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1304); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (769); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 539 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 366 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1083); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1088); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 835 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (937); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (770); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (606); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2484 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 605 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1864); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3439); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (831); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1050 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3083); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 389 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1074); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (795); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (571); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1054 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (872); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (763); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (594); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 566 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1729); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (870); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 587 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1759); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (677); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 807 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2436); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 790 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 563 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 794 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 646 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1905); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 596 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1736); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1061 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (579); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 380 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (488); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3758); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 280 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 13:48 SAST.