DA 29.0%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- DA 29.0%
- ActionSA 22.6%
- ANC 19.8%
- Others 28.7%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 1 498 valid votes
DADemocratic Alliance43429.0%
ActionSA33822.6%
ANCAfrican National Congress29619.8%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change18412.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance1359.0%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus644.3%- PIKGRAAFCommunity First Party392.6%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters60.4%- KDFKaroo Democratic Force20.1%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Laingsburg vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Laingsburg ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 5
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 500 · 6 of 10 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 6 voting districts with results so far here (1 203 of 1 803). The IEC publishes 64.7%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2082: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (733); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1105: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2082: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (426); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (400); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1105: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2038: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 64.7%; its own counts give 66.72% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:21 SAST.