WardsActionSA 2ANC 2DA 1darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the PR ballot per ward

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

DA and ActionSA 3 seats each of 10 · 6 for a majority

Most party (PR) votes: ActionSA 26.3%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

LaingsburgAll 10 voting districts in

All 5 wards complete

Turnout63.8%

Voters on the roll5 288

South Africa · Counting23 474 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.1%)

checked 13:06Latest results

PR ballot ? · 3 345 valid votes

ActionSA88126.3%
DADemocratic Alliance85625.6%
ANCAfrican National Congress80824.2%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change3009.0%
PAPatriotic Alliance2597.7%
PIKGRAAFCommunity First Party1233.7%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus932.8%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters150.4%
KDFKaroo Democratic Force60.2%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement40.1%

Council seats · 10 ?

Democratic Alliance1 ward · 2 PR3
ActionSA2 ward · 1 PR3
African National Congress2 ward · 0 PR2
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
People's Movement for Change0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Laingsburg ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 5

On EskomSePush

LaingsburgPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 849 · All 10 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 10 voting districts here (3 374 of 5 288). The IEC publishes 63.8%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2082: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (733); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1105: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2082: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (578); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (558); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2082: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (400); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1105: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2038: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 484 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1065); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (881); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1105: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2082: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2038: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 04:04 SAST.