WardsDA 6ANC 1Partly counted 7No results, yetdarker = bigger win

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

DA 49.3%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot

DA 49.3%
ANC 18.8%
PA 10.7%
Others 21.2%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 114 of 23 696 voting districts in (4.7%)checked 02:56Latest results

Witzenberg13 of 41 voting districts in0 of 12 wards complete

Turnout so far40.5%

Voters on the roll so far7 754

Ward ballot ? · 3 074 valid votes

DADemocratic Alliance1 51449.3%
ANCAfrican National Congress57918.8%
PAPatriotic Alliance33010.7%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1655.4%
ICOSAIndependent Civic Organisation of South Africa722.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters622.0%
WAWitzenberg Aksie622.0%
WPWitzenberg Party471.5%
GOOD431.4%
AWEH!Aboriginal Warriors 4 Economic Hope!371.2%
DAWIDemocratic Association of Witzenberg Independence290.9%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change290.9%
ARAAfrica Restoration Alliance180.6%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party140.5%
WIDWitzenberg Onafhanklike Demokratiese Party130.4%
PDMPeople's Democratic Movement110.4%
CCCNational Coloured Congress110.4%
SACPSouth African Communist Party100.3%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania80.3%
CAPEXITCape Independence Party / Kaapse Onafhanklikheids Party80.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party60.2%
IndependentIndependent candidates20.1%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement20.1%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement20.1%

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Witzenberg vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Witzenberg ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power635hours off63 outages

Water16hours off1 outage

Internet29hours off4 outages

Wards · 12

On EskomSePush

WitzenbergPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 12 · 13 of 41 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 13 voting districts with results so far here (3 137 of 7 754). The IEC publishes 40.5%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (912); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (841); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 02:49 SAST.