WardsDA 6PA 1ANC 1Partly counted 8No results, yetdarker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

DA 47.6%

Leading on the DC 40% ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · DC 40% ballot

DA 47.6%
ANC 19.3%
PA 13.7%
Others 19.4%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 400 of 23 696 voting districts in (5.9%)checked 03:24Latest results

Witzenberg17 of 41 voting districts in0 of 12 wards complete

Turnout so far40.8%

Voters on the roll so far12 803

DC 40% ballot ? · 5 147 valid votes

DADemocratic Alliance2 45047.6%
ANCAfrican National Congress99219.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance70713.7%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus2264.4%
WPWitzenberg Party2074.0%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1252.4%
ICOSAIndependent Civic Organisation of South Africa851.7%
GOOD531.0%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change521.0%
DAWIDemocratic Association of Witzenberg Independence470.9%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party370.7%
ARAAfrica Restoration Alliance290.6%
AWEH!Aboriginal Warriors 4 Economic Hope!290.6%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania190.4%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party120.2%
SACPSouth African Communist Party100.2%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement100.2%
CAPEXITCape Independence Party / Kaapse Onafhanklikheids Party90.2%
CCCNational Coloured Congress90.2%
LIPLangerberg Independent Party80.2%
4TH GEN4th Generation Movement80.2%
PDMPeople's Democratic Movement60.1%
DNCADemocratic New Civic Association50.1%
A.C.C.Alliance of Citizens for Change40.1%
BOBreedevallei Onafhanklik30.1%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement30.1%
L1Langeberg First20.0%

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Witzenberg vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Witzenberg ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power635hours off63 outages

Water16hours off1 outage

Internet29hours off4 outages

Wards · 12

On EskomSePush

WitzenbergPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 111 · 17 of 41 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 17 voting districts with results so far here (5 218 of 12 803). The IEC publishes 40.9%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (703); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (741); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (912); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 486 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1467); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (818); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (841); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 414 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:22 SAST.