WardsANC 7DA 3darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the PR ballot per ward

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 9 of 20 seats · 11 for a majority

Most party (PR) votes: ANC 42.8% · down 9.8 pts from 52.6% in 2021

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

NdlambeAll 34 voting districts in

All 10 wards complete

Turnout61.3%

Voters on the roll37 779

South Africa · Counting19 409 of 23 696 voting districts in (81.9%)

checked 12:34Latest results

PR ballot ? · 22 957 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress9 83242.8%
DADemocratic Alliance8 04535.0%
TBPMThina Bahlali People's Movement2 54811.1%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters7213.1%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus5992.6%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party2911.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance2871.3%
Ndlambe Citizens MovementNdlambe Citizens Movement2701.2%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party1460.6%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement960.4%
SACPSouth African Communist Party680.3%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement360.2%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement180.1%

Council seats · 20 ?

African National Congress7 ward · 2 PR9
Democratic Alliance3 ward · 4 PR7
Thina Bahlali People's Movement0 ward · 2 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Ndlambe ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power64hours off6 outages

Water65hours off6 outages

Internet28hours off4 outages

Wards · 10

On EskomSePush

NdlambePower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 2 008 · All 34 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 34 voting districts here (23 147 of 37 779). The IEC publishes 61.3%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1541 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4607); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 708 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3619); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 783 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1485 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 649 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1971); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4068); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3600); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1045 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1719); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (834); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2997); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 649 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (901); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 899 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2693); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 790 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2510); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 813 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 468 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1398); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 323 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (970); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 947 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 500 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (512); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7042); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2181: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 16:50 SAST.